Blog

One of the most common questions I hear during breast augmentation consultations is some version of this: “I have been researching implants online and I keep seeing different brands. Which one is actually the best?”

It is a fair question, and I want to give you a genuinely useful answer, not a sales pitch for one brand over another, but a real breakdown of what separates Motiva, Natrelle, and Mentor from each other, what the research and clinical experience actually show, and how I think about implant selection for my patients in Dallas, Plano, Southlake, and across the DFW area.

The short version: all three are excellent, FDA-cleared implant brands with strong safety records and extensive customization options. The best implant for you is not the best implant in the abstract. It is the one that fits your anatomy, your lifestyle, your goals, and your surgeon’s recommendation. Here is what you need to know to have that conversation.

The Big Three: A Quick Overview

Natrelle (Allergan/AbbVie)

Natrelle implants, manufactured by Allergan (now owned by AbbVie), are among the most widely used breast implants in the world and have one of the longest clinical track records in the industry. Natrelle offers both saline and silicone gel options, including the Inspira line for round implants and the 410 “gummy bear” anatomical implants, which use a highly cohesive gel that maintains its shape even if the shell is compromised. Natrelle implants are well-studied, extensively used, and available in a very wide range of sizes, profiles, and gel consistencies. They are a reliable, proven choice with decades of real-world outcome data behind them.

Mentor (Johnson & Johnson)

Mentor is another long-established implant brand with an extensive clinical history. Also FDA-cleared for both saline and silicone gel options, Mentor is known for its MemoryGel line of silicone implants, which use a cohesive gel formulation that retains shape while maintaining a soft, natural feel. Mentor’s MemoryGel Xtra offers a slightly firmer gel for patients seeking more shape retention, and their CPG (Contour Profile Gel) line provides anatomical options. Like Natrelle, Mentor implants are well-studied, widely available, and carry a strong safety profile supported by extensive long-term clinical data.

Motiva (Establishment Labs)

Motiva implants, manufactured by Establishment Labs, represent the newest generation of the three brands discussed here. They are 6th-generation silicone implants built around three proprietary technologies: Ergonomix2® adaptive shaping technology, SmoothSilk® nano-surface engineering, and ProgressiveGel® fill. Motiva implants are FDA-cleared for primary breast augmentation in women 22 and older and for revision surgery.

Motiva’s key differentiator is positional adaptability. Ergonomix2® implants shift dynamically with body position, forming a teardrop shape when standing and a softer, rounder contour when lying down, closely mimicking the behavior of natural breast tissue. This dynamic responsiveness, combined with the SmoothSilk® surface designed to reduce capsular contracture risk, is what makes Motiva a compelling option for patients prioritizing the most natural possible result.

Motiva vs. Natrelle vs. Mentor: Key Differences

Feel and Natural Movement

Motiva earns consistent praise from surgeons and patients for producing the softest, most natural-feeling result of the three. The Ergonomix2® technology and ProgressiveGel® fill give Motiva implants a dynamic, tissue-like quality that neither Natrelle nor Mentor fully replicates. For patients who put natural feel and movement at the top of their priority list, Motiva has a meaningful advantage.

Natrelle and Mentor both offer excellent, soft, natural-feeling results with their standard silicone gel lines. The difference is primarily that they do not adapt positionally the way Motiva’s Ergonomix2® implants do. In practice, most patients are very happy with the feel of both Natrelle and Mentor silicone, particularly with softer gel options like Natrelle Inspira or Mentor MemoryGel.

Capsular Contracture Risk

Motiva has invested significantly in reducing capsular contracture risk through its SmoothSilk® nano-surface engineering. The surface is designed to encourage favorable tissue integration and reduce the low-grade inflammatory response believed to trigger capsular contracture. Early data and real-world clinical experience from surgeons using Motiva are encouraging, though long-term population-level data of the same depth as Natrelle and Mentor is still accumulating given that Motiva is the newest of the three brands.

Natrelle and Mentor both have extensive long-term data on capsular contracture rates across their implant lines. Dr. Abtahi’s Keller Funnel no-touch insertion technique significantly reduces contamination risk and capsular contracture rates with any implant brand.

Implant Options and Customization

Natrelle and Mentor offer the broadest range of customization options, including saline, standard silicone gel, highly cohesive silicone, and anatomical (shaped) implant options. For patients with very specific size, projection, or shape requirements, the wider catalog may offer options not available in the Motiva range.

Motiva offers Round and Ergonomix® lines in a wide range of sizes and profiles, comprehensive for the majority of patients but narrower overall than the full Natrelle or Mentor catalog. Motiva does not currently offer saline implants.

Clinical Track Record and Data

Natrelle and Mentor have the longest clinical track records, with decades of large-scale outcome studies, FDA clinical trial data, and real-world experience across millions of patients.

Motiva is the newest of the three and has a shorter track record in the U.S. market. Its FDA clearance is more recent, and while clinical data are positive, they are not yet as extensive. This reflects the brand’s shorter U.S. market history, not a safety concern.

Cost

Motiva implants carry a higher per-implant cost than Natrelle or Mentor, reflecting the proprietary technology and newer manufacturing process. Natrelle and Mentor are generally priced similarly to each other and typically somewhat less expensive than Motiva. The right implant for you should not be chosen on cost alone, but it is a realistic factor worth discussing during your consultation.

A Note on Textured Implants and BIA-ALCL

If you have been researching breast implants, you have likely come across news about BIA-ALCL (breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma), a rare immune system cancer linked to textured breast implants. BIA-ALCL has been associated with macro-textured implant surfaces. In 2019, Allergan voluntarily recalled its Biocell textured implant line. Mentor’s SILTEX textured line has not been recalled but carries an FDA warning. Smooth implants from all three brands, including Motiva’s SmoothSilk® surface, have not been associated with BIA-ALCL.

At Amor Propio Aesthetic Surgery, Dr. Abtahi uses smooth-surface implants from all three brands. Patients considering smooth implants from any manufacturer can do so with confidence based on current evidence.

How Dr. Abtahi Thinks About Implant Selection in Dallas

I want to be direct about how I approach this in practice, because I think it is the most useful thing I can tell you.

I do not have a single favorite implant brand. I use Motiva, Natrelle, and Mentor regularly, and I select the implant that best fits the individual patient in front of me. That decision is based on several factors:

• Anatomy: your existing breast tissue, skin quality, chest wall dimensions, and nipple position all inform which implant type and profile will create the most harmonious result
• Goals: patients seeking the most natural possible movement and feel are often best served by Motiva Ergonomix®. Patients seeking a fuller silhouette may prefer round options across all three brands
• Lifestyle: active patients, athletes, and women who do yoga or high-impact sports often gravitate toward Motiva’s positional adaptability once they understand how it works
• Preferences on data: some patients are more comfortable with implants that have decades of outcome data behind them. I respect that and will never pressure a patient toward a newer brand
• Budget: I will always be honest about cost differences and help you make a decision you feel good about at every level

The implant is one important variable in a breast augmentation outcome, but it is not the only one. Surgical technique, incision placement, pocket creation, and implant insertion method all matter enormously. A well-placed Mentor implant in the right patient, inserted with the Keller Funnel no-touch technique, will consistently outperform the “best” implant placed with poor technique. Choosing the right surgeon is at least as important as choosing the right implant brand.

Quick Comparison: Motiva vs. Natrelle vs. Mentor

Here is a side-by-side summary of the key differences across the three brands.

*Textured Natrelle and Mentor options carry FDA warnings or have been recalled (Allergan Biocell). Dr. Abtahi uses smooth-surface implants only.

The Bottom Line: Which Breast Implant Is Right for You?

There is no universal answer, and I would be skeptical of any source that tells you there is. What I can tell you is this:

Choose Motiva if your top priorities are the most natural feel and dynamic movement available, reduced capsular contracture risk through nano-surface engineering, and you are comfortable with a newer-generation implant that has strong but less extensive long-term U.S. data than the established brands.

Choose Natrelle if you want the widest customization options including anatomical implants, decades of outcome data, and a proven track record across millions of patients. Natrelle’s Inspira line offers excellent softness and feel for patients who want a natural result without the Motiva premium.

Choose Mentor if you prioritize long clinical history, comprehensive size and profile options, and a well-established safety record. Mentor’s MemoryGel silicone is consistently well-reviewed for its natural feel and durability.

In every case, the implant that is right for you is the one recommended by a board-certified plastic surgeon who has taken the time to understand your anatomy, your goals, your lifestyle, and your priorities. That recommendation should be based on your individual situation, not on which brand happens to be most popular or most heavily marketed at any given moment.

If you are considering breast augmentation in Dallas, Plano, or Southlake, TX, I would be glad to walk you through all three options during your consultation. You can view before and after photos on our gallery, learn more about Motiva breast implants on our dedicated procedure page, or schedule your consultation directly online.

Dr. Ali R. Abtahi, DO MSc is a board-certified plastic surgeon at Amor Propio Aesthetic Surgery in Southlake, TX, serving patients from Dallas, Plano, Fort Worth, Frisco, Keller, Grapevine, and the greater DFW area. Call (469) 293-2533 or contact us online to schedule your breast augmentation consultation.